# 243. Messy Means

I have recently been teaching lower ability Year 9 students how to calculate the mean from grouped and ungrouped data tables. I didn’t want to teach them a method to learn by rote, so I used a more investigative approach.

Image Credit: http://www.thisismykea.com/designs/mr-messy

Grouped Frequency tables discussion

I started with a table with all the working shown, but some information blacked out. Each group had an A3 version and they filled in what was missing.

The second table had more information covered up. After a discussion the groups decided there wasn’t enough information and they would have to guess what the missing numbers were.

The third table had minimal information. Each group used their own method to find the missing values. Some chose the largest value in the range, some guessed what the results could have been in each group and one group decided to calculate two means – one using the largest value and one using the smallest.

We collected our results together on the board and discussed their accuracy. The class decided to use the middle of each range to calculate the estimated mean. They had gone from no understanding of estimated mean to formulating their own method.

We followed this up a Splitting the Steps estimated mean worksheet that I wrote after seeing Bruno Reddy’s presentation after #MathsConf2014 (Mr Reddy’s blog).

## 7 thoughts on “243. Messy Means”

1. Pingback: 243. Messy Means | ryanjhay79

2. Sarah Roberts

Thanks this looks great – I’m going to try this next week. On the first pdf the mean says 107/15 instead of 104/15 – is that deliberate or a mistake?!

3. MsKMP Post author

Hi Sarah, You were correct, there was a typo – I’ve corrected it and uploaded a new version.

4. Pingback: Averages (TLP) | Solve My Maths

5. Laura Teague

Lovely idea – I’ve been looking for a less didactic way of teaching this for a while and this looks like it might do the trick. One Q: for table A, 5 can’t be included in the first class? As it is less than not including 5, and 5 is in the next group?

Thanks

Laura